Para no tener que discutir con los fanboy de Telepalmira, decidi hacer unas pruebas desde las conexiones adsl2+ de Telepalmira y coaxial de Telmex.
Importante es la calidad y la eficiencia de la conexion, no tanto la velocidad.
Diferencias entre los proveedores en
bold.
www.visualware.com (voiptest)
VoIP test statistics - Telepalmira
--------------------
Jitter: you --> server: 6.2 ms
Jitter: server --> you: off (Bloqueo de ETB corp)
Packet loss: you --> server: 0.0 %
Packet loss: server --> you: off (Bloqueo de ETB corp)
Packet discards: 0.0 %
Packets out of order: 0.0 %
Estimated MOS score: 3.9
VoIP test statistics - Telmex
--------------------
Jitter: you --> server: 1.6 ms
Jitter: server --> you: 3.6 ms
Packet loss: you --> server: 0.0 %
Packet loss: server --> you: 0.0 %
Packet discards: 0.0 %
Packets out of order: 0.0 %
Estimated MOS score: 4.0
www.broadbandreports.com
Broadbandreports test - Telepalmira:
Test DownloadActual data bytes sent: 1040293
Actual data packets: 720
Max packet sent (MTU): 1492
Max packet recd (MTU): 1492
Retransmitted packets: 12
sacks you sent: 209
pushed data pkts: 63
data transmit time: 10.308 secs
our max idletime: 388.3 ms
transfer rate: 94068 bytes/sec
transfer rate: 752 kbits/sec
transfer efficiency: 98% < Es posible llegar a 100% configurando correctamente el router.
ICMP (ping) check Minimum ping: 128.61 ms
Maximum ping: 167.57 ms
Ping stability:
128.61 140.04 135.42 134.26 167.57 131.80 136.13 139.33 135.05 135.13
--------------------------------------------------------
Broadbandreports test - Telmex:
Test DownloadActual data bytes sent: 1024001
Actual data packets: 703
Max packet sent (MTU): 1500
Max packet recd (MTU): 1500
Retransmitted packets: 0
sacks you sent: 0
pushed data pkts: 102
data transmit time: 2.978 secs
our max idletime: 252.4 ms
transfer rate: 305957 bytes/sec
transfer rate: 2447 kbits/sec
transfer efficiency: 100%
ICMP (ping) check Minimum ping: 112.40 ms
Maximum ping: 114.96 ms
Ping stability:
113.93 114.41 112.83 112.82 113.25 112.40 114.96 113.35 112.53 112.85
www.visualware.com
Trace Telepalmira:
VisualRoute Connection Test to 190.9.108.244
Performed on 17 Nov 2008 03:57:54 GMT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Hop | %loss | IP Address | Node Name | Location | ms | Graph | Network |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | 0 | 205.234.111.204 | DTG311.visualware.com | Ashburn, VA, USA? | - | | Defender Technologies
| 1 | 0 | 205.234.111.129 | r03-8.iad.defenderhosting.com | Washington, DC, USA | 0 | + | Defender Technologies
| 2 | 0 | 69.65.112.25 | r01.iad.defenderhosting.com | Washington, DC, USA | 0 | + | Defender Technologies
| 3 | 0 | 208.111.133.114 | - | Tempe, AZ, USA? | 0 | + | Limelight Networks
| 4 | 0 | 208.111.133.113 | tge12-4.fr4.iad.llnw.net | Washington, DC, USA | 0 | + | Limelight Networks
| 5 | 0 | 69.28.171.213 | ve5.fr3.iad.llnw.net | Washington, DC, USA | 2 | + | Limelight Networks
| 6 | 0 | 213.140.52.37 | GE1-2-grawaseq1.red.telefonica-wholesale.net | Washington, DC, USA | 0 | + | Telefonica
| 7 | 0 | 213.140.43.78 | GE3-0-0-0-grtwaseq2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net | Washington, DC, USA | 1 | + | Telefonica
| 8 | 0 | 84.16.12.182 | So2-3-0-0-grtmiana2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net.12.16.84 | (Spain)? | 48 | +- | Telefonica
| 9 | 0 | 84.16.11.26 | ETB-3-3-3-0-grtmiana2.red.telefonica-wholesale.net | Miami, FL, USA | 69 | + | Telefonica
| 10 | 100 | - | - | - | - | | -
| 11 | 100 | - | - | - | - | | -
| 12 | 100 | - | - | - | - | | -
| 13 | 0 | 190.25.240.74 | corporat190-025240074.sta.etb.net.co | Bogota, Colombia? | 98 | + | ETB - Colombia
| 14 | 100 | - | - | - | - | | -
| 15 | 0 | 190.9.108.244 | - | Cali, Colombia? | 125 | +- | UNITEL S.A E.S.P
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trace Telmex:
VisualRoute Connection Test to 190.146.xxx.xxx
Performed on 17 Nov 2008 03:08:48 GMT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Hop | %loss | IP Address | Node Name | Location | ms | Graph | Network |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | 0 | 69.65.110.165 | dtg445.visualware.com | Ashburn, VA, USA? | - | | Defender Technologies Group LLC DEFENDER-1 |
| 1 | 0 | 205.234.111.129 | r03-8.iad.defenderhosting.com | Washington, DC, USA | 0 | + | Defender Technologies Group LLC DEFENDER-1 |
| 2 | 0 | 69.65.112.25 | r01.iad.defenderhosting.com | Washington, DC, USA | 0 | + | Defender Technologies Group LLC DEFENDER-1 |
| 3 | 0 | 208.111.133.114 | - | Tempe, AZ, USA? | 1 | +- | Limelight Networks Inc. LLNW-3 |
| 4 | 0 | 208.111.133.113 | tge12-4.fr4.iad.llnw.net | Washington, DC, USA | 0 | + | Limelight Networks Inc. LLNW-3 |
| 5 | 0 | 69.28.172.33 | tge1-2.fr4.atl1.llnw.net | Atlanta, GA, USA | 16 | + | Limelight Networks Inc. LLNW-1 |
| 6 | 0 | 68.142.119.193 | ve5.fr3.atl1.llnw.net | Atlanta, GA, USA | 16 | + | Limelight Networks Inc. LLNW-2 |
| 7 | 0 | 69.28.172.14 | tge2-1.fr3.mia1.llnw.net | Miami, FL, USA | 30 | + | Limelight Networks Inc. LLNW-1 |
| 8 | 0 | 68.142.100.230 | - | Tempe, AZ, USA? | 30 | + | Limelight Networks Inc. LLNW-2 |
| 9 | 0 | 201.125.224.185 | customer-201-125-224-185.uninet.net.mx | (Mexico)? | 83 | +- | Gestión de direccionamiento UniNet |
| 10 | 0 | 201.125.242.37 | customer-201-125-242-37.uninet.net.mx | - | 81 | + | - |
| 11 | 0 | 200.26.157.154 | - | Bogota, Colombia? | 106 | +- | Telmex Colombia S.A. |
| 12 | 0 | 172.22.111.2 | - | - | 91 | +- | (private use) <Posible nodo MediaCommerce! |
| 13 | 0 | 190.146.xxx.xxx | Static-IP-crxxxxxxxxxxxx.cable.net.co | Bogota, Colombia? | 114 | +- | Telmex Colombia S.A. |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pueden ver que hay menos hop en la ruta de Telmex. Menos hops significa menos problemas.
Puedo colgar otro chorro de cifras, pero no creo que es util ya que la mayoridad de los compañeros no sabran como interpretarlos y tampoco creo que son muy importante.
Hasta ahora es obvio que la conexion de Telepalmira/ETB es bastante mas inestable, observa el nivel del "line jitter", estabilidad del ping y transfer efficiency entre otros.
Para poder determinar cual es la mejor opcion para la banda ancha en Palmira, no podemos fijarnos solo en el aspecto de la calidad de la conexion.
El servicio al cliente tambien es importante, y tal vez lo mas importante es el costo de todo esto.
Estos dos puntos no los voy a tratar aca, todos sabemos que Telepalmira no tiene servicio al cliente, y me parece mas cruel aun la comparacion entre una conexion de 512Kb solo internet de Telepalmira con una conexion de 4Mbit Triple Play de Telmex.
Toman sus conclusiones caballeros.
Escorpiom.